Recent Posts

Thursday, June 28, 2007

We Want Surround Sound, Not Unwieldy Wires! How Can I Easily Integrate Rear Channel Speakers?

One of the benefits of moving toward a home entertainment setup with HDTV is the delivery of surround sound from HD sources. The experience of a movie from a Blu-ray or HD DVD player can be greatly enhanced by audio cues that literally surround you and immerse you in the picture. To take advantage of this, however, you need to have multiple speakers scattered throughout the room with wires going through walls, under rugs, or over ceilings. Or that's what one would think. There are actually some options out there to help achieve home theater surround sound without all of the wired speaker trouble.

One of the most popular methods of obtaining surround sound involves a setup of six speakers, called "5.1 surround sound". This translates into a left, center, and right channel speakers as well as two rear speakers. The "dot one" after the five refers to the sub-woofer that delivers the deep bass rumbles. Since components such as the TV, receiver, and DVD player typically sit at the front of the room, integrating the left, center, and right channel speakers is usually not a problem. There are some "three in one" speakers that combine these, but the help is really needed in finding how to hook up those rear channel speakers. This is the achilles heel of surround sound setup. For many, the idea of running wires through the room ranges from unpleasant to infeasible. There are two main alternatives to traditional rear speaker wiring: wireless speakers and sound projectors.

Wirless Rear Speakers
The idea of running all of the surround sound speakers wirelessly is not a new concept. But the idea has been plagued by issues of throughput capabilities, range, and interference. Though the use of radio frequency signals that focus on just two speakers (our rear channels), the concept of wireless becomes more practical. There are two ways to accomplish this. The first is done by using a wireless speaker module (like the one shown from Kenwood), that may utilize the speakers you already have. The second method includes a set of speakers, such as the ones shown by Acoustic Research. Both use a base unit that attaches directly to the audio source and generally have ranges over 100 feet. Because they use radio frequency, the signal is not interrupted by walls or furniture. The thing to keep in mind with a wireless speaker system is that power needs to be delivered to those rear channel units. Although some wireless speakers may be run with batteries, it is recommended that they be plugged into a nearby outlet. In most homes, however, a power outlet is easier to find than a good place to run those wires.



Sound Projectors
A second alternative for those wishing to escape the mess of speaker wires utilizes a method of sound projection and reflection. A single sound source uses a large number of speakers to bounce sound off available walls and reflect back to the listener. This provides the audible illusion of speakers scattered throughout the room. Yamaha makes some of the most popular devices of this type. They claim that they can deliver multi-channel sound to the listener in the same way that sound from front, center and rear speakers does. The sound projector precisely controls the orientation of sound by focusing it into beams. The center channel sound is heard directly, while the sounds from other channels are heard after reflecting off the walls surrounding the listener. Depending on the room configuration, this is done through a variety of beam modes. An example of these beam modes is shown in the illustration provided.

Although some woofers are included in the package, to deliver deep bass sounds, the manufacturer recommends the use of this product along with a sub-woofer. The sub-woofer may be the only other audio component needed. Due to the unique way it refects audio, the sound projector replaces all of the other speakers, including the rear channels. And because the device decodes Dolby Digital, DTS, Pro Logic, and Pro Logic II, it effectively replaces what a receiver does. It includes a variety of audio inputs, including digital and analog, allowing multiple devices to be attached directly to the speaker device and bypassing any receiver.



So, how good is the audio experience from a sound projector? Well, it depends. The verdict is that the audio quality is much more dependent on the room configuration than a standard speaker setup. If there are good walls that can reflect sound, however, then sitting in the "sweet spot" can have breathtaking results. If the room configuration does not allow proper beam bouncing, the quality of the experience may deteriorate. For many cases, however, it does a good job of providing surround sound experience without a big hassle. For those audio enthusiasts, it will likely not replace actually having multiple speakers in the room. But for those who value convenience over perfection, it is a great alternative. Additionally, it is nice way to get surround sound in secondary rooms such as a bedroom.

Conclusion
For those avoiding the leap to a surround sound system because of the difficulty in integrating rear channel speakers, help is available. Solutions involving wireless speakers or sound projectors can facilitate the installation and avoid the hassle of rear speaker wires. So come and join the fun - and immerse yourself in the surround sound experience!

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Full HD May Be Full of It! Is the High Resolution 1080p HDTV Worth The Premium Price?

With the emergence of high definition televisions that have a greater resolution than standard HDTVs, some interesting questions are popping up. Is this new technology, dubbed "Full HD" or "1080p", worth the price?

Question:
What? Now that 1080p Full HD televisions are being sold, my 720p HDTV must be only "partially" high definition! Is that something like being partially pregnant? I thought a television was either high definition or it wasn't. What is all the fuss about?

Answer:
While the minimum requirement for high defintion is indeed 720 lines of resolution, the HD television manufacturers have been pushing these new "Full HD" televisions. These sets tout incredible clarity through the use of 1080 lines of progressive scan resolution - otherwise known as '1080p'. Progressive scan means that every line is refreshed during each cycle, as opposed to the inferior interlaced scan (1080i) that refreshes every other line at a time. With 1920 columns for each of those 1080 lines, the Full HD package delivers over 2 million pixels (pixels are those miniscule dots that make up the picture). That is over twice as many pixels as the typical 720p high definition television that emerged first into the HDTV market. Three circles in the illustration above show how the shape becomes smoother when more dots (pixels) are used to create the object. The three circles represent pixel counts to similate 480p (DVD quality), 720p (standard HD), and 1080p (full HD). An example of how a photographic image becomes sharper with greater pixel count is shown, too. For best results, click on the image to get the larger version. The 1080p resolution sounds impressive. So why is there any question that this technology is the way to go? Two reasons: visual acuity and content availability.

Visual Acuity
Let us first address the issue of visual acuity. I initially discussed this topic in a post entitled, Size Matters. Back then, I explained that visual acuity refers to the capability of the human eye. A person with 20/20 vision is able to distinguish lines on a screen that are separated by 1/60th of a degree. The reason this figure is described as degrees of an arc is because you can see a smaller line when up close, but when further away the line must be larger to be visible. This creates an angle - an angle of approximately 1/60th of a degree.

How much detail a person can see on a television depends two things: (1) the line thickness determined by the screen resolution and (2) the viewing distance. The greater the resolution, the more lines on the screen and the more difficult it is to distinguish the individual lines. If you are able to actually see the individual lines on a TV screen, you may need to sit farther away, get a higher resolution screen, or both. It is my belief that you don’t want to be able to distinguish individual lines. This will ensure top picture quality perception.

Based on visual acuity, the chart at the left was created to show at what resolution screen lines become indistinguishable. For example, watching a 46-inch television at a 10-foot distance, the 720p resolution has a line thickness that is virtually indistinguishable by the human eye. There is likely no benefit to using a 1080p screen in this situation. At that same 10-foot distance, however, a 60-inch television could benefit from 1080p. Or the 46-inch screen viewed at a shorter 8-foot distance could also benefit from Full HD. The recommended resolution depends on the combination of screen size and viewing distance. This chart is useful in finding those instances when 1080p may be justified.

This chart also provides information about recommended screen sizes for different home applications. The black areas show situations that adhere to professional cinema guidelines for immersive (hard core) home theater viewing. The grey areas adhere to specifications and recommendations for more typical (practical) home entertainment applications. Again, please see the earlier post, Size Matters, for more details. Again, you may click on the chart to get a larger image.

Content Availability
There is another concern about the effectiveness of Full HD. Despite the capabilities of a 1080p television, there is very little content available to take advantage of this ultra high screen resolution. Currently there is no satellite, cable, or over-the-air programming presented in 1080p. All of the available HD content from these sources is in either 720p or 1080i.

There are, however, two proven methods to get 1080p content to a Full HD television. First, a qualified HD disc player such as a Blu-ray or HD DVD may be capable of this type of high resolution output. While all Blu-ray players are capable of 1080p, it is necessary to bypass the introductory HD DVD players and make sure the upgraded 1080p player is used. The second source for 1080p content comes from either the Xbox 360 or Playstation 3 gaming system. These have games capable of Full HD output as well as disc players that can provide top notch resolution. That just about sums up the current availability of HD content in crystal clear 1080p.

Despite the lack of 1080p content today, the emphasis of this high quality resolution in the television marketplace will eventually trickle down to the content providers. As more folks invest in this technology, they will look (and pay) for content to take advantage of it. Technology will continue to move forward and 1080p televisions will become the standard. And when homes are filled with 1080p televisions, you will see content providers begin to offer the improved content. It will take time, but it will happen. If you're investing in a TV that you plan on keeping beyond the end of 2008, it is reasonable to expect that you will have more content available in the 1080p resolution. The investment in Full HD should be considered a longer term commitment.

Conclusion
The technological advancement of 1080p is undisputed. It is hard to argue with twice the pixel count. The issue comes from whether this improved performance is worth the 20 - 25% price premium a Full HD television can carry. If the television size and viewing distance at least gives the opportunity to enjoy the enhanced image, then 1080p should be considered. If considered, the decision should be made based on the range of content available now and in the near future. For many, movies on HD discs are the primary reason they would want improved clarity anyway. So these folks, Full HD will bring the ultimate in picture clarity and an incredible viewing experience. For others, their circumstances just don't justify the higher resolution. So look at your individual circumstances and determine for yourself whether 1080p is worth it - or whether the extra expense for Full HD is just "full of hi-def dung".

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

12 Hottest HD DVD Movies! What Are The Most Visually Entertaining Movies for My HD DVD Player?

One of the first questions that people have after they hook up their HD DVD player is, "what are the best movies to watch in HDTV?" The issue at hand is that the HD DVD format is still relatively new and not all of your favorites will be available. Despite being offered through movie distributors that support HD DVD, movies like Twister are still not available in the higher resolution format. Also among the ranks of those movies not yet introduced in HD DVD are the Jurassic Park trilogy, Shrek/Shrek 2, and The Lord of the Rings series. These flicks represent some of the eye candy and action blockbusters that are expected to "wow" you on your new HD DVD player. Alas, they are not available yet. So, this situation begs the question: what are the best movies I can get for my HD DVD?

The following is a list of a dozen of the top eye-popping movies currently available (or soon to be) under the HD DVD format. The release date, domestic box office revenue and displayed aspect ratio are listed. Additionally, you can mouse-over the images for ordering information.

  1. King Kong
    Universal, released 11/16/06; U.S. Box Office est. $218,000,000; Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  2. 300
    Warner, estimated release 07/31/07; U.S. Box Office est. $210,000,000; Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  3. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
    Warner, released 10/10/06; U.S. Box Office est. $206,500,000; Aspect Ratio 1.85:1



  4. Batman Begins
    Warner, released 10/10/06; U.S. Box Office est. $205,300,000; Aspect Ratio 2.40:1



  5. The Mummy Returns
    Universal, released 01/16/07; U.S. Box Office est. $202,000,000; Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  6. Superman Returns
    Warner, released 11/28/06; U.S. Box Office est. $200,000,000; Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  7. The Fugitive
    Warner, released 05/23/06; U.S. Box Office est. $183,900,000; Aspect Ratio 1.85:1



  8. The Perfect Storm
    Warner, released 06/06/06; U.S. Box Office est. $182,600,000; Aspect Ratio 2.40:1



  9. Mission: Impossible
    Paramount, released 05/22/07; U.S. Box Office est. $181,000,000; Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  10. Happy Feet
    Warner, released 03/27/07; U.S. Box Office est. $198,000,000; Aspect Ratio 2.40:1



  11. The Bourne Supremacy
    Universal, released 05-23-06; U.S. Box Office est. $176,000,000; Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  12. The Polar Express
    Warner, released 10-10-06; U.S. Box Office est. $176,600,000; Aspect Ratio 2.40:1


For a list of the top Blu-ray movies, visit my post highlighting the alternate format.



Monday, June 25, 2007

12 Best Blu-Ray Movies! What are the Most Visually Stunning HDTV Movies Available to Watch on My Blu-ray Player?

One of the first questions that people have after they hook up their new Blu-ray player is, "what are the best movies available?" The issue at hand is that the Blu-ray format is still relatively new and not all of your favorites will be available. Despite being offered through movie distributors that support the Blu-ray format, movies like Titanic (Fox), Finding Nemo, and The Incredibles (Buena Vista) are still not available in crystal clear 1080p Blu-ray discs. Other cinema series such as Star Wars and Spider-Man are still awaiting release, too. These types of flicks represent some of the action blockbusters that should "wow" you when played on your new HD Blu-ray player. Alas, they are not available yet. So, this situation begs the question: what are the best movies I can get for my Blu-ray?

The following is a list of a dozen of the top eye-popping movies currently available (or soon to be) under the Blu-ray format. The release date, domestic box office revenue, and aspect ratios are displayed. Additionally, you may mouse over the disc cover graphics for ordering information.

  1. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
    Buena Vista, released 05/22/07, U.S. Box office est. $423,000,000, Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  2. Night at the Museum
    Fox, released 04/24/07, U.S. Box office est. $251,000,000, Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  3. 300
    Warner, to be released 07/31/07, U.S. Box office est. $210,000,000, Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  4. Pearl Harbor
    Buena Vista, released 12/19/06, U.S. Box office est. $198,500,000, Aspect Ratio 2.20:1



  5. X-Men: The Last Stand
    Fox, released 11/14/06, U.S. Box office est. $234,000,000, Aspect Ratio 2.40:1



  6. Superman Returns
    Warner, released 11/28/06, U.S. Box office est. $200,000,000 Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  7. The Fugitive
    Warner, released 09/26/06, U.S. Box office est. $183,900,000, Aspect Ratio 1.85:1



  8. Mission: Impossible
    Paramount, released 05/22/07, U.S. Box office est. $181,000,000, Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  9. Terminator 2: Judgment Day
    Lionsgate, released 06/27/06, U.S. Box office est. $204,800,000, Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  10. Monster House
    Columbia, released 10/24/06, U.S. Box office est. $74,000,000, Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  11. Planet of the Apes
    Fox, released 02/13/07, U.S. Box office est. $180,000,000, Aspect Ratio 2.35:1



  12. Happy Feet
    Warner, released 03/27/07 , U.S. Box office est. $198,000,000, Aspect Ratio 2.40:1


For a list of the top HD DVD movies, visit my post highlighting the alternate format.